For the
past five to seven years, I’ve been living in a news bubble, largely avoiding
stories and news reports from the world at large. I hadn’t planned to do this. Until
Pip could talk I listened to the news on the radio while we snacked or played.
However, as he got more capable, this arrangement stopped working. He would
start to play with a toy while I was listening to a news story and before I
knew it the toy would come flying across the room. It turned out I couldn’t pay
attention to both Pip and the news. One thing had to go, and it wasn’t going to
be Pip. So, the radio got turned off. The bubble got turned on. Polly’s arrival
a year or so later fully cemented this arrangement.
Now that Pip and Polly are in
school, I suddenly have time to pay attention to the news again. I read the
Washington Post at lunch and browse through the Economist – a gift from Ava –
in the evenings. When the first issue of that magazine arrived, I was
overwhelmed by all the crazy things that were going on in its pages: Russia has
annexed the Crimea and is trying to take over more of eastern Ukraine? Large
parts of Syria and Iraq are being controlled by some metastasized terrorist
group I’ve never heard of? Police units are rolling out tanks in Ferguson,
Missouri? A commercial airliner disappeared over the Indian Ocean and another from
the same company was shot out of the sky a couple of weeks later? I wondered if
the world had exploded while I was out of touch or if this was just a normal
condition that I was no longer used to.
I also began to wonder exactly what
it was I was supposed to do with all of this information. When I was in high
school and college these kinds of stories thrilled me. They represented history
in the making. They were context for understanding the world. They were data that
I could use in my future life. The people and places in those stories
represented a world that was different from the one I was living in, one that
was more important, one that I could strive to join. Even in grad school, I
read the news with a purpose. I was studying Islamist politics and geographies
of capitalism and globalization. Everything I saw in the news had the potential
to show up somewhere else – whether it was in an example in a paper, in a
conversation with other students, or in some lecture by a visiting professor.
All of this was something to know so that I could be a part of it.
Now, on the
other side of school and kids, none of that feels true anymore. As I have found
myself lured more deeply into random on-running news-stories – Scotland is
voting to break off from the United Kingdom? – I am coming to realize that in
my present life there is little to no difference between reading the news in
the Economist and flipping through the pages of US Weekly. In neither case am I
reading for any particular reason beyond curiosity and escapism. President
Obamas plan to fight the Islamic State has no more immediate bearing on my life
than some celebrity’s hemline. Regardless of what I read in the paper, the most
pressing questions I need to answer – how are the kids doing at school, when is
soccer practice, what issues are cropping up at Ava’s work – are all
hyper-local. The world where all these news stories are happening – be they the
financial impacts of Brazils presidential election or stolen nudes of famous
actresses – feels farther away than ever.
This idea
that the news is just another form of entertainment is not revelatory. One only
needs to look on the main page at Yahoo to see Kate Middleton’s wardrobe
choices and Kim Kardashians latest shenanigans intermixed with headlines about
Russia’s geopolitical strategies and gun control questions in Florida. The
headlines on that page target the interests of very different people, but they
all appeal to the same instinct – a desire to read about some other world, a
desire to step outside your own for a little while.
What is
interesting to me in all of this is what my reaction says about where I am in
my life. I guess it reflects something of a mid-life crisis. The dream that I
would be a part of these stories, that my world would somehow overlap or
interweave with these, has faded away, leaving me unsure about how to relate to
things I use to easily understand. I still want to read about the world beyond
my doorstep. I’m still interested to learn what’s going on in Beijing and
Baghdad and Moscow. But, to my surprise, I no longer want them to come closer.
In fact on most days, I’m happy for them all to be just as irrelevant as the
latest controversial pop lyrics, to be curiosities that I can read about,
enjoy, and then easily put away. We’ve got plenty of challenges to work out
within the four walls of our home. I no longer have the time or interest to
claw my way into the news world as well.
I couldn't agree more. I went through a similar arc in my own life. Every once in awhile I turn on the news only ot be reminded how it isn't relevant to me. I also find it triggers negative emotions: fear, anger, disgust, envy. Just another reason to avoid it completely.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the j2jenkins and appreciate this post!
ReplyDeleteFor a few weeks our family has been watching the CNN Student News, a 10-minute, online hodgepodge of the latest world and local events and some soft news that aims to appeal to a middle or high school age. It was exciting for the first five days or so and my children (mostly younger) were thrilled [disclaimer: we don't have a television and they don't get a lot of exposure to this type of media]. The topics (ebola, Scotland, Ferguson, ISIS) gave us PLENTY of fodder for conversation and it was educational. Gradually, however, I grew disenchanted with it, especially when attempting to view it through my children's eyes, and I attribute that to the abrupt switches from death and destruction to the fox playing with a soccer ball in someone's backyard. The soft news, cheery music, and strings of jokes belied the seriousness of the frightening issues...and perhaps belittled them. Anyway, it showed me again that these elements are meant to entertain and make a profit as much or more than they are to inform. And I don't want my children thinking that is normal!
There's probably some balance to be achieved as far as my/their exposure to world events and how they effect the way we live/perceive others is concerned but I'm not sure CNN or any of the usual media outlets is the way to that end.
Thanks for both of your thoughts. The news as it is sold through magazines, newspapers, and especially the television can be a gruesome experience. I haven't yet figured out how to skim from that world for Pip and Polly, but it is definitely something to be taken in little chunks and with plenty of parental commentary.
ReplyDelete