Fathers worry about
their sons because boys do stupid things. Fathers worry about their daughters
for the same reason.
In one of
the rooms, the hosts, in an attempt to provide some direction, had laid out a
bunch of different games for the kids to play. These were largely ignored at
first in favor of building sculptures out of marshmallows, grapes, and
toothpicks. However, as the party went along various kids began picking among
the assembled options for things that interested them. At one point I looked in
to see that two kids had set up a chess board on the floor and were attempting
to play a game. One of the kids was definitely a less experienced chess player
than the other – the latter was walking the former through the moves the
various pieces could make with relative, though by no means perfect, accuracy.
About five minutes later I heard a
great deal of ruckus coming from the same room. Peeking around the corner I
witnessed two additional kids now crouched down beside the board basically yelling
at the less experienced kid, competing with each other to tell this kid what
they were doing wrong. One of the interloping observers even shouted something
to the effect of,
“You might
as well start over. You’re doing it all wrong.”
The less experienced kid definitely appeared overwhelmed and in shock from the hyperactive, sugar fueled onslaught of these two know-it-all observers.
As I
watched all of this through the doorway, I felt caught in a state of hesitant
uncertainty. First of all, none of the four kids around the board belonged to
me. Second, it wasn’t a physically dangerous interaction. The house was quite
loud, and the know-it-alls’ yelling was not in and of itself out of place. Third,
the bullying effect of their actions was not apparent to any of the other three
kids. They weren’t intentionally ganging up on the fourth. They were caught up
in a competition between themselves that led them to gang up on the fourth. It
would have been very easy to read the whole interaction as one of hyperactive
silliness if I hadn’t seen the fear in the face of that fourth kid. It was this
fear that finally prompted me to step in and ask the kids to calm down. They
did to some extent, but the effect of their yelling had already been writ. A
few moments after I turned away, the less experienced kid quietly pushed down
all the pieces on the chessboard and left the room, bringing an end to the
game.
This small
drama has stayed in my mind the last couple of weeks for two reasons. First, it
was a discomfiting reminder of how violence happens even in ‘safe’ situations.
The kids around that chess board were smart, good kids from decent families.
They were not looking to exact any kind of violence on someone. But, the chaos
of the environment and the competition of the moment overwhelmed their
consciousness of what actions are right and respectful and obliterated any
awareness they may have possessed regarding the emotions of the person they
were ostensibly trying to coach.
Second, there was a gender
component to the equation. The less experienced kid in this episode was a girl.
The other three were boys. And, they were belittling her over a game of chess,
a game whose history skews toward masculine associations. I don’t know that
this drama in itself represents anything in particular, but it seemed in
alignment with a pattern common in many male-dominated arenas – the girl’s
knowledge was deemed unfit, even when her playing partner set up the board
wrong and was making his share of mistakes as well.
Both Wired magazine and the
Washington Post published commentaries this week talking about how women in the
technology sector are systematically overlooked by male supervisors, have their
skills routinely questioned, and have their contributions to projects regularly
downplayed. These patterns do not result from conscious misogynism. I imagine
that there is a general discourse in the technology sector that women and men
are equally good at coding, but that women have not tended to get in to the
field to start with (I know this thinking was true in my engineering classes
two decades ago). But there is a difference in saying the right thing,
believing the right thing, and doing the right thing. The last of those three
is the hardest to get to as it means not only being aware of the patterns but
also reprogramming many of the social cues and unconscious responses that create
those patterns. These unthought elements, the ones that pass by unnoticed in
day-to-day interactions, the ones that get reproduced accidentally in the
pressure of the moment, the ones that get reinscribed in a sugar-fueled
competition over which boy is most right about a chess move, are the ones that
continue to perpetuate the structural inequalities of the world into which we
were born.
I’ve be thinking a lot about Polly
since watching that chess game because while Polly wasn’t the girl on the other
side of the board that day, one day she will be. I once imagined or hoped that
wouldn’t be the case. I thought perhaps enough would change by the time she
entered the adult world that she would be able to largely avoid the agony of
such ridiculousness. Watching those eight-year old boys enact exactly that
ridiculousness has quashed that hope, and I’m not sure what to do about it. I
don’t know how Polly should respond to those boys lost in their own particular
world. I don’t know how to prepare her to persevere through their stupidity. I’m
not sure how to tell her what is to come.
In the face of all that uncertainty
there is one hope to which I still cling: that when it is her turn to face it
the idiocy – in whatever form it appears - she will enough knowledge and support
around her to call it out for the ridiculousness it is.
This illustrates one of my top reasons for avoiding public education for my children: the somewhat unnatural situation of many children of the same age stuck together for an extended period of time with limited adult supervision (and too much of *that* is focused on crowd control, which I would consider more maintenace, not building). A common result seems to be trouble in some form - perhaps because they are still learning so much about how to socialize...only there are no parents (or few!) around to put in the training required. When I was a PS student, there was practically no training in how to properly socialize. I hear there is more nowadays, at least as far as anti-bullying campaigns go. I understand there are time constraints. And I understand that many situations, as you pointed out, are not intended by their perpetrators to be negative. Kids are kids (smart and nice as they are) and need training!
ReplyDeleteObviously there are lots of other issues at hand and I'm oversimplifying a bit - not to mention that it wasn't a school function! - but I still feel more and more strongly that parents need to be on hand wherever their children are to instruct them in proper patterns for adulthood. When I do see this happening, it's a beautiful thing.
Thanks, Tara. I appreciate your thoughts.
ReplyDelete